Mission Statement
 

Editor-in-Chief Speeches and Articles

This web site is an effort by the Pipeline Safety Foundation to provide those facts -- comprehensively, verifiably -- to a broad range of users from top policy-makers to homeowners interested in learning more about the potential solutions, as well as the hazards and problems, of America's oil and natural gas pipeline system.

We have organized this web site to make it easy for users to find what they need on-line to make informed decisions about pipelines. We provide many key documents and data sources in their full text, others in links to numerous web sites, and for still others a road map to find them. We seek to provide up-to-date information, breaking news stories, and the background context in which pipeline companies operate. We are also eager to hear from you with your information, tips on pipeline accidents or unsafe conditions, and industry or regulator whistleblowers.

In short, we seek to provide the facts you need to work for pipeline safety reforms, a forum you can contribute to, and guidance on how to make yourselves heard by policy-makers.

 




A Stronger Pipeline Safety Act
Ostensibly enacted to protect the public safety and environment, the federal Pipeline Safety Act instead enables oil and natural gas pipeline companies to avoid responsibility for its unacceptable number and severity of accidents.



Among the most important reforms to the act which the Pipeline Safety Foundation seeks are:

  • Add release liability provisions similar to those in the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which have resulted in over a 60 percent reduction in large releases by other modes of transporting petroleum in the United States.

  • Amend the citizen suit provisions to facilitate private enforcement actions, such as injunctions to correct dangerous conditions of pipelines.

  • Enable states to protect their public and environment by deleting preemption of state standards for interstate pipelines that are more stringent than federal standards.

  • Provide states with the resources and authority to be full partners with the Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) in developing and enforcing safety and environmental standards.

  • Eliminate the "regulatory reform" cost-benefit provisions that enable rigged analyses to prevent meaningful regulatory improvements from being adopted.

  • Objectively review the "Risk Management Demonstration Project," which has exempted several companies from federal regulations.

  • Authorize spending levels for the OPS that enable this chronically-underfunded agency to provide adequate enforcement, research and technical assistance.

A More Effective Office of Pipeline Safety
With few resources to perform even its most basic functions, and a history of lax standards and enforcement, the OPS has failed repeatedly to respond to the challenge of improving pipeline safety.

  • Develop a comprehensive mapping program that locates all interstate and intrastate pipelines that goes beyond the current voluntary, piecemeal project, and provide these maps to affected state and local governments.

  • Adopt stringent standards in such areas as periodic testing by best available technologies, accurate leak detection measures, corrosion protection, useful life standards for older pipelines, operating personnel certification, and enhanced standards in environmentally sensitive areas.

  • Eliminate the exemption of "gathering lines" and other rural low-pressure pipelines which allow operators to avoid federal regulation altogether.

  • Enforce standards with improved inspections, including physical examinations of high-risk pipelines, thorough investigation of serious accidents and safety violations, full use of civil penalties, transparent enforcement proceedings, and improved collection and analysis of accident data.

  • Develop a program with state and local governments to improve land-use regulations, such as setback requirements at pipeline rights-of-way, to prevent urban encroachments that increase the danger of third-party damage.

  • Encourage states with limited or no intrastate pipeline regulatory programs to establish such programs as partners with the OPS.

  • Conduct research and development to assess effectiveness of promising new technologies and regulatory approaches.

  • Develop a comprehensive strategy to replace the nation's aging and deteriorating pipeline infrastructure.

Other Reforms

  • The pipeline industry should reverse the decline in spending by operators on maintenance, prevention, detection and cleanup budgets, as well as increase the share of its revenues devoted to replacement of its aging infrastructure.

  • State and local governments should take the initiative to develop more effective pipeline regulatory and emergency response programs, as well as develop land-use and building code regulations to protect rights-of-way of existing pipelines from encroachment and to site new pipelines away from residential and commercial developments and environmentally sensitive areas.

  • The National Research Council should undertake a comprehensive study of pipeline safety that includes best available data on the true extent of pipeline accidents and their risk factors, similar to the 1993 Risk Assessment Report by the California State Fire Marshal.

  • National environmental and other public interest organizations should adopt as a high priority the reform of pipeline safety laws and regulations.

 


Bob Rackleff, Editor-in-Chief SPEECHES AND ARTICLES

Bob Rackleff is a corporate speechwriter, pipeline safety consultant, and elected public official in Tallahassse, Florida. As a speechwriter, he serves such corporate and nonprofit clients as United Technologies, AOL Time Warner, Vivendi Universal, Ford Foundation, and Collins Center for Public Policy. He also provides research and advocacy services about pipeline safety for environmental and other organizations. As a Leon County Commissioner since 1998, he has applied smart growth and sustainability principles in such areas as transportation, growth management and economic development.

Before returning to Tallahassee in 1986, Rackleff was a speechwriter for President Jimmy Carter, U.S. Senator Ed Muskie, and the Chairman of Time Inc. He is also a retired Naval Reserve Intelligence Officer; his last billet was managing editor, Naval Intelligence Quarterly. He earned a bachelor's and master's degree in U.S. history at Florida State University, where he also completed all requirements but a dissertation for a doctorate, also in U.S. history.

He publishes widely on environmental and pipeline safety subjects, including articles in the Washington Post, Vital Speeches, Environmental Action magazine, and a 1972 book, Close to Crisis: Florida's Environmental Problems.

After leading a grassroots organization in North Florida that stopped the construction of a proposed gasoline tank farm and pipeline in 1995 after a six-year battle, he helped found the National Pipeline Reform Coalition, which seeks federal legislation and regulation for safer pipelines, and the Pipeline Safety Foundation, a Web-based clearinghouse of information and documents.

He has been a consultant on pipeline safety for the Environmental Defense Fund, Florida Alliance, City of Fredericksburg (VA), Cascade-Columbia Alliance and other organizations. He has served on the Environmental Experts Committee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Pipeline Infrastructure Study, and Florida Department of Environmental Protection Advisory Committee on Aboveground Storage Tanks. He was also an invited participant at the OPS Public Hearing on Improving the Pipeline Safety Program (1995), USDOT National Pipeline Safety Summit (1994), and the EPA Forum on Aboveground Storage Tanks (1993).

He may be reached by email through this site or by telephone at 850-222-9789.



Speeches and Articles About Pipeline Safety by Bob Rackleff

Friends of the Aquifer: "Communities Against the Pipeline" Meeting in Woodstock, Illinois, June 11, 1996

Friends of the Aquifer: "Buckingham Area Homeowners" Meeting Fort Myers, Florida, July 26, 1995

National Pipeline Reform Coalition Propeller Club of Washington, DC, May 7, 1998

"Grieving Carlsbad," opinion article, Albuquerque Tribune, September 9, 2000. http://www.co.leon.fl.us/BCC/rackleff/issues/pipeline.htm.

"Pipelines: A National Perspective," keynote address, National Pipeline Reform Conference, Washington, DC, April 9, 2000.

Remarks at American Petroleum Institute Refining Environmental Workshop, Orlando, FL, September 30, 1998.

Remarks at the Cascade Columbia Alliance Board of Directors Retreat, Issaquah, WA, February 7, 1998.

Remarks at a public meeting of the Communities Against the Pipeline, Woodstock, IL, June 11, 1996.

"The Public Must Demand Gas Pipeline Safety," letter to editor, New York Times, January 25, 1995.

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, U.S. House Committee on Public Works and Transportation, Washington, DC, May 18, 1993.

"The Environmental Dangers of Oil Pipelines," remarks at a meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Council, Mobile, AL, March 10, 1992.

"Out of Line," article, Environmental Action, November/December, 1991.

"Get Off Your Tanks and Do Something!" Aboveground Tank Update, November, 1991.

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, U.S. House Committee on Public Works and Transportation, Washington, DC, September 25, 1991.

"The Oozing of America," opinion article, Washington Post, September 15, 1991.

Statement before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power U.S. House Committee on Commerce and Energy Hearing on "Pipeline Safety Act of 1991" (H.R. 1489) Washington, D.C. May 22, 1991.

 

 
Copyright © 2002 Pipeline Safety Foundation